An Introduction to The Second Monopoly and The Open-Book Examination — Companion Files

Understand & Reason the Constitutional Argument Yourself:

Three chapters of The Second Monopoly by Roleigh Martin
(formerly titled The Forgotten Half of the Patent Clause)

Chapter 1, Four Problems, One Remedy; Chapter 28, Reason the Constitutional Argument Yourself: The Open-Book Examination; and Chapter 35, When Outsiders Advance Constitutional Law and Other Disciplines — together with the files below — are reproduced here from the book The Second Monopoly by Roleigh Martin.

Chapter 35 sets out twenty cases in which someone outside a field saw what everyone inside it had missed. Chapter 1 is the book’s comprehensive introduction.

The exam chapter invites you to put the constitutional argument to an artificial-intelligence language model and judge for yourself whether the reasoning holds. To do that, download one of the exam files below, attach it to the AI, and paste in the prompts the chapter provides. The scoring sheet records what each model answers.

Eleven models have already been given the book’s open-book examination, including the legal-research engine OpenCase, and all eleven found a genuine constitutional conflict. Their complete replies are published in Appendix C, with a link to each model’s own session, so you can read what they said rather than take it on report. They settle nothing — only a court can — but the convergence is part of the record, and you can add your own run to it.

These files are provided free of charge to readers of that chapter. The examination was given while the book was titled The Forgotten Half of the Patent Clause, so the exam files keep that name.

How to use these files

Start a new chat with an AI language model. Tap the attach or paper-clip icon, choose the exam file you downloaded, then paste one of the prompts from the chapter. Run each prompt in a fresh chat so the model answers it on its own. Full step-by-step instructions are in Part Two of the chapter.

A note for attorneys — and for readers who know one

This constitutional argument is being prepared for federal court. As the book moves toward publishers, one question recurs: whether a non-lawyer can be trusted to handle the argument responsibly. A few words from a practicing attorney would answer that better than anything the author could say. Want to know about the author? Read his book preface here.

If you are a lawyer and, after reviewing the materials, you consider the work well-researched and deserving of serious consideration and a public hearing, the author welcomes a brief statement to that effect — in your own words, implying no agreement with the book’s conclusions. And if you simply know an attorney for whom this argument is suited, passing it along would be a real help.

Any attorney who reaches out can receive the complete Author’s Review manuscript — PDF, printed trade paperback (at cost), or EPUB. The one-page invitation above explains the request in full.

To reach the author, or to send a paragraph:
x.com/RoleighMartin  ·  RoleighMartin@proton.me